Research Query
Ask a question against the local research corpus and get a synthesized answer with inline citations.
Triggers
- "what does the research say about X?"
- "query the corpus for X"
- "search research for X"
- "what evidence do we have for X?"
- "research query X"
/research-query "question"
Parameters
<question> (required)
A natural language question to answer from the corpus.
--depth (optional)
Search depth: quick (tag + title matching only) or thorough (full-text content search). Default: thorough.
--save (optional)
Save the synthesized answer as a new artifact in .aiwg/research/synthesis/.
--sources-only (optional)
List matching sources without synthesizing an answer.
--max-sources (optional)
Maximum number of sources to read and synthesize from. Default: 10.
Execution Flow
Phase 1: Corpus Search
Search the local research corpus for relevant sources:
- Tag-based search: Grep frontmatter
tags:fields in.aiwg/research/findings/REF-*.mdfor topic matches - Title search: Match question keywords against
title:frontmatter fields - Full-text search (if
--depth thorough): Search body content of all REF-XXX notes for question terms - Synthesis search: Also check
.aiwg/research/synthesis/for existing synthesis on the topic - Knowledge search: Check
.aiwg/research/knowledge/for related concept notes
Search locations (priority order):
.aiwg/research/findings/REF-*.md # Primary: literature notes
.aiwg/research/synthesis/*.md # Secondary: existing synthesis
.aiwg/research/knowledge/*.md # Tertiary: knowledge base entries
Phase 2: Source Reading
For each matching source (up to --max-sources):
- Read the full content of the REF-XXX note
- Extract:
- Key claims and findings
- GRADE quality assessment
- Methodology and evidence type
- Related source references
- Rank by relevance to the question
Phase 3: Answer Synthesis
Synthesize a comprehensive answer from the matched sources:
- Lead with the answer — state the synthesized finding clearly
- Cite inline — reference specific REF-XXX identifiers with the finding they support
- Note evidence quality — use GRADE-appropriate hedging:
- HIGH: "Evidence strongly supports..."
- MODERATE: "Evidence suggests..."
- LOW: "Limited evidence indicates..."
- VERY LOW: "Preliminary findings hint at..."
- Flag contradictions — if sources disagree, state both positions with citations
- Identify gaps — if the question touches areas with sparse coverage, note what's missing
Answer format:
## Answer
[Synthesized answer with inline citations]
Evidence strongly supports that agent orchestration patterns improve
task completion rates by 30-45% compared to single-agent approaches
(REF-012, REF-034). However, this comes with increased latency —
REF-067 measured a 2-3x slowdown for multi-agent coordination on
tasks under 5 minutes. Limited evidence indicates that the breakeven
point is approximately 15 minutes of task complexity (REF-042, GRADE: Low).
### Sources Consulted
| REF | Title | GRADE | Relevance |
|-----|-------|-------|-----------|
| REF-012 | Multi-Agent Orchestration Patterns | High | Direct |
| REF-034 | Agent Coordination Benchmarks | Moderate | Direct |
| REF-067 | Latency Analysis of LLM Pipelines | Moderate | Supporting |
| REF-042 | Cost-Benefit of Agent Architectures | Low | Tangential |
### Evidence Quality
- 1 HIGH, 2 MODERATE, 1 LOW sources
- Overall confidence: MODERATE
### Gaps
- No sources address orchestration in resource-constrained environments
- Missing: longitudinal studies on orchestration pattern stability
### Related Queries
- "What are the latency costs of multi-agent systems?"
- "How does orchestration affect token consumption?"
Phase 4: Save (if --save)
If --save is specified, write the answer as a synthesis artifact:
.aiwg/research/synthesis/query-<slug>-<date>.md
With frontmatter:
---
type: query-synthesis
question: "<original question>"
date: YYYY-MM-DD
sources: [REF-012, REF-034, REF-067, REF-042]
confidence: moderate
---
Distinction from Other Skills
| Skill | Purpose | Searches |
|---|---|---|
research-query |
Answer questions from corpus | Local corpus only |
research-discover |
Find new papers in external databases | External (arXiv, Semantic Scholar) |
research-gap |
Identify missing coverage areas | Local corpus (intellectual gaps) |
corpus-health |
Check structural integrity | Local corpus (structural health) |
research-cite |
Format a citation | Single REF-XXX note |
aiwg index query |
Generic artifact search | All .aiwg/ artifacts |
Examples
# Ask a question
/research-query "What are the security risks of LLM agents?"
# Quick search (tags and titles only)
/research-query "prompt injection defenses" --depth quick
# Just list matching sources
/research-query "multi-agent orchestration" --sources-only
# Save the answer as a synthesis artifact
/research-query "What evidence supports HITL gates?" --save
# Limit sources consulted
/research-query "cost optimization strategies" --max-sources 5
References
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/research-complete/skills/research-discover/SKILL.md — External search
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/research-complete/skills/research-gap/SKILL.md — Gap analysis
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/research-complete/skills/research-cite/SKILL.md — Citation formatting
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/research-complete/skills/research-status/SKILL.md — Corpus health
- @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/research-complete/elaboration/templates/REF-XXX-template.md — REF note format