Skip to main content
Generalhashgraph-online

document

Trigger: public API, function, or module added or changed — exports, signatures, new modules.

Stars
336
Source
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins
Updated
2026-05-27
Slug
hashgraph-online--awesome-codex-plugins--document
View on GitHubRaw SKILL.md

// install — copy + paste into any project

mkdir -p .claude/skills && curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/HEAD/plugins/epicsagas/epic-harness/registry/skills/document/SKILL.md -o .claude/skills/document.md

Drops the SKILL.md into .claude/skills/document.md. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any agent that loads SKILL.md files from .claude/skills/.

Document — Auto-Documentation

When to Trigger

  • New public function, class, or API endpoint
  • Function signature changed (params added/removed)
  • Module purpose unclear from code alone
  • User explicitly asks for documentation

Process

1. Detect what changed

  • New exports? → Add JSDoc/docstring
  • Changed params? → Update existing docs
  • New file? → Add module-level doc comment

Why: Undocumented changes are the most common source of onboarding friction. Catching every diff ensures no public surface is left without context.

2. Write docs

Follow the project's existing doc style. If none exists:

TypeScript/JavaScript:

/**
 * Brief description of what this does.
 *
 * @param name - Description of parameter
 * @returns Description of return value
 * @throws ErrorType - When this happens
 *
 * @example
 * const result = myFunction("input");
 */

Python:

def my_function(name: str) -> str:
    """Brief description.

    Args:
        name: Description of parameter.

    Returns:
        Description of return value.

    Raises:
        ValueError: When this happens.
    """

Why: Consistent doc style across the project reduces cognitive load for every reader. Inlining examples prevents the "how do I call this?" round-trip.

3. Don't over-document

  • Skip obvious getters/setters
  • Skip internal/private helpers unless complex
  • Code should be self-documenting first, comments second

Why: Noise docs train readers to ignore all comments. Document only where the code cannot speak for itself.

Anti-Rationalization

Excuse Rebuttal What to do instead
"The code is self-documenting" Good naming helps readers, but doesn't explain intent, constraints, or edge cases. Document the why, the constraints, and the non-obvious.
"I'll document it later" Later never comes. If it's worth exporting, it's worth documenting now. Document as you write. Updating is cheaper than reconstructing intent.
"Docs go stale anyway" Stale docs are better than no docs. They at least signal intent. Keep them in sync with code changes. Put docs near code (JSDoc/docstring). They update with the code.

Evidence Required

Before claiming documentation is done, show ALL applicable:

  • Every new public function/class has a doc comment (show one example)
  • Changed signatures have updated docs (show the diff)
  • @param / @returns / @throws present for non-trivial functions
  • At least one @example for complex APIs

"I added docs" without showing them = not documented.

Red Flags

  • Comments that restate the code: // increment ii++
  • Outdated comments that contradict the code
  • Missing docs on public API that others will call