Skill Dispatch Engine
CRITICAL: When accessing harness data, run HARNESS_DIR=$(epic-harness path) first. NEVER use .harness/ in the project directory.
You have access to the following skills. Invoke the matching skill BEFORE responding or taking action. Even a 1% chance of relevance means you should invoke it.
Dispatch Rules
| Context Signal | Invoke Skill |
|---|---|
| New feature implementation starting | tdd |
| Test failure, error, or unexpected behavior | debug |
| Auth, DB, API, infra, or secrets code touched | secure |
| Loops, queries, rendering, or data processing code | perf |
| File > 200 lines or high cyclomatic complexity | simplify |
| Public API/function added or changed | document |
| Before completing /go or /ship | verify |
| User wants to commit changes | commit |
| Context window > 70% used | context |
| User request is vague, unfocused, or presents a solution without a clear problem | discover |
| User shares code for review, mentions code smells, or asks to refactor/analyze | episteme → analyze_code + suggest_refactorings → feed results into go:plan mode |
User invokes /reflect, asks about AI usage quality, "am I using AI well", "thought amplifier", or requests AI usage self-assessment |
reflect |
| Session start (project has harness-mem psychographic node) | Call mem_list type=psychographic → apply 5-dimension profile to all subsequent skill dispatch |
Orchestration run active ($HARNESS_DIR/orchestrator/run.json exists with status "running") |
orchestrate |
| Agent tool output received with inter-agent message | orchestrate |
User runs /intervene |
orchestrate |
| 요구사항 정의 필요, 스펙 없음 | spec |
| 빌드/구현 시작, 스펙 승인됨 | go |
| 리뷰/감사/테스트 필요 | audit |
| PR 생성 / CI / 배포 준비 | ship |
Alias Routing
Users can still type legacy command names. Map them:
/spec→ invoke skill spec directly/go→ invoke skill go directly/audit→ invoke skill audit directly/check→ invoke skill audit directly (legacy alias)/ship→ invoke skill ship directly/discover→ invoke skill discover directly/intervene→ invoke skill orchestrate (intervene mode)/status→ invoke skill orchestrate (status mode)
Loop Transition Signals
When a phase completes, prompt the user toward the next step. Do NOT auto-proceed — surface the transition explicitly.
| Phase completed | Condition | Prompt to user |
|---|---|---|
/discover problem framed |
status: framed written |
"Problem defined. Run /spec to turn this into a buildable specification." |
/spec saved |
status: approved written |
"Spec saved. Run /go to start building." |
/go report done |
All tasks complete, tests green | "Build complete. Run /audit to verify before shipping." |
/audit report done |
All PASS + all AC verified | "Audit passed. Run /ship to create a PR." |
/audit report done |
Any FAIL or AC missing | "Fix blockers with /go, then re-run /audit." |
/ship report done |
PR created, CI green | "Shipped. Loop complete." |
/orbit phase done |
Pipeline status: running |
"(orbit) Phase complete. Continuing to next phase..." |
/orbit audit FAIL × 3 |
audit_fail_count >= max_retries |
"(orbit) 3 audit failures reached. Pausing for your input." |
/orbit complete |
PR created, CI green | "(orbit) Pipeline complete. See consolidated report above." |
/intervene executed |
Control directive written | "Intervention recorded. Use /status to monitor." |
These transitions are informational nudges only. The user controls when each phase runs.
Orbit Mode Override
When /orbit is active (detected by: $HARNESS_DIR/orbit/PIPELINE-*.json exists with status: running):
- SUPPRESS normal phase transition prompts ("Run
/go", "Run/audit", "Run/ship", etc.) — orbit handles its own phase transitions internally - Dispatch skills normally — tdd, debug, verify, secure, perf, simplify, document, context all fire as usual within each phase
- episteme pre-analysis: if episteme
suggest_refactoringsoutput is present in context before/orbitstarts, pass it directly to go:plan as spec material — auto-detect direct mode - After orbit completes (
status: completeorstatus: aborted) — resume normal dispatch behavior
Orbit Recovery on Session Resume: When a session resumes (after context compaction or crash) and an active pipeline is detected:
- Emit:
"(orbit) Recovering pipeline {id}. Phase: {phase}. Branch: {branch}." - Do NOT re-run mode selection — the mode was already chosen and recorded in
modefield - Do NOT re-run spec creation — the spec file path is in
spec_filefield - Resume from the current
phaseas documented in the pipeline state - If
phaseisauto_detectwith nomodeset, run auto-detection logic (PRD present → council, clear request → direct, vague → council) and proceed without asking
The orbit command is a self-contained pipeline. Interjecting normal transition nudges during orbit would confuse the user.
Confusion Protocol
When you encounter high-risk ambiguity, you MUST stop and present options instead of guessing.
High-risk ambiguity triggers:
- Architecture decisions (choosing between patterns, frameworks, or approaches)
- Data model changes (schema modifications, new tables, migration strategy)
- Destructive scope (deleting features, breaking API changes, removing code)
- Cross-cutting concerns that affect multiple modules
Protocol:
- STOP — do not proceed with any implementation
- STATE — clearly describe the ambiguity in one sentence
- OPTIONS — present 2-3 concrete options with trade-offs
- ASK — wait for user decision before continuing
Example:
AMBIGUITY: You asked to "fix the auth flow" but this could mean: A) Fix the token refresh bug in the existing JWT flow (surgical, 30 min) B) Migrate from JWT to session-based auth (architectural, 2 days) C) Add MFA to the existing flow (additive, 1 day) Which approach do you want?
NEVER guess the scope of an ambiguous request. 2 minutes of clarification saves 2 hours of rework.
Priority
- User's explicit instructions — highest priority
- Skill directives — override defaults
- Default behavior — lowest priority
If a user says "skip tests", respect that. Skills guide, users decide.
Dispatch Logging
Every skill invocation must be logged for evolution analysis. After selecting skills to invoke, record the dispatch event:
- Create
$HARNESS_DIR/dispatch/dispatch_YYYYMMDD.jsonlif it doesn't exist - Append a JSON line:
{ "timestamp": "<ISO>", "trigger_signal": "<signal>", "selected_skills": ["<skill1>", ...], "context_hint": "<why>" }
This enables Ring 3 to analyze which skills fire most often, which are effective, and tune dispatch rules accordingly.
Memory-Augmented Dispatch
Before invoking any skill, proactively recall relevant knowledge from the memory graph:
- At task start: Call
mem_recallwith a hint describing the current task (e.g., "auth refactor", "CI pipeline fix"). This returns relevance-ranked memories combining FTS match, importance, recency, access frequency, and graph connectivity. - On errors: Call
mem_recallwith the error category/message as hint. Past resolutions and patterns for similar errors surface automatically. - On architectural decisions: Call
mem_recallwith the domain area. Pastdecisionnodes (importance=0.9) rank highest and prevent contradictory choices. - After resolution: Record via
mem_addwith typeresolution(auto-importance=0.8) ordecision(auto-importance=0.9). These high-importance nodes persist across sessions and resist decay. - Fallback: If
mem_recallis unavailable, usemem_search(keyword FTS) ormem_context(project-scoped smart recall).
Memory scoring: recency(25%) + importance(35%) + access_freq(15%) + FTS_match(25%). Frequently accessed and important memories naturally float to the top; unused noise decays over time.
This enables cross-session learning: the agent remembers past mistakes, decisions, and solutions — and retrieves the most relevant ones for the current context.
Evolved Skills
Check $HARNESS_DIR/evolved/ for project-specific auto-evolved skills. These are generated by the Ring 3 evolution loop based on actual failure patterns.
How to scan evolved skills:
- List directories in
$HARNESS_DIR/evolved/— each is a skill - Read each
SKILL.mdfile's YAML frontmatterdescriptionfield - The description contains the trigger condition (e.g., "Auto-evolved. bash tool success rate was 38%.")
- If the current context matches ANY evolved skill's trigger condition, invoke it
- If an evolved skill overlaps with a static skill (tdd, debug, secure, etc.), the static skill takes priority — evolved skills are supplements, not overrides
Evolved skill naming convention:
evo-{pattern_type}— from failure pattern detection (e.g.,evo-fix_then_break,evo-repeated_same_error)evo-{tool}-discipline— from weak tool category (e.g.,evo-bash-discipline)evo-{ext}-care— from weak file type (e.g.,evo-ts-care)evo-fix-{error}— from high-frequency error (e.g.,evo-fix-build-fail)
When evolved skills are present, it means:
- The evolution loop detected a real weakness in past sessions
- Following the evolved skill's guidance should prevent repeat failures
- If an evolved skill's advice conflicts with a static skill, prefer the static skill — evolved skills supplement, static skills are authoritative
Psychographic Adaptation
When user preference data is available in harness-mem (psychographic nodes), adapt dispatch behavior:
5-Dimension Profile
| Dimension | Values | Effect on dispatch |
|---|---|---|
scope_appetite |
conservative / moderate / ambitious | conservative: smaller, safer changes. ambitious: larger refactors allowed |
risk_tolerance |
cautious / balanced / bold | cautious: more verification steps. bold: fewer checkpoints |
detail_preference |
brief / standard / thorough | brief: minimal output. thorough: detailed explanations |
autonomy |
guided / collaborative / independent | guided: ask before each step. independent: execute autonomously |
architecture_care |
pragmatic / balanced / principled | pragmatic: working > elegant. principled: patterns > shortcuts |
How to use
- At session start, call
mem_listwith type=psychographic to load profile - If no profile exists, use defaults: moderate/balanced/standard/collaborative/balanced
- Apply profile dimensions to skill selection and execution parameters:
scope_appetite=conservative: Prefer simplify skill. Flag changes touching >3 files.
risk_tolerance=cautious: Run verify after every skill. Add extra test runs.
detail_preference=brief: Skip explanatory output. Show only results and blockers.
autonomy=guided: Present plan before execution. Ask at each decision point.
architecture_care=principled: Trigger council skill for architectural decisions. Enforce pattern compliance.
Profile storage
Store profiles using mem_add with:
- type: "psychographic"
- title: "user-profile: {project}"
- tags: ["psychographic", "profile", project slug]
- body: YAML-formatted 5-dimension values
- importance: 0.8 (high — guides all behavior)
Process
- On every user message, scan the Dispatch Rules table for matching context signals
- For each match, invoke the corresponding skill BEFORE responding or taking action
- If multiple skills match, invoke all of them (order: secure > debug > tdd > others)
- Log every dispatch to
$HARNESS_DIR/dispatch/dispatch_YYYYMMDD.jsonl - Check
$HARNESS_DIR/evolved/for project-specific skills that supplement static skills - Apply psychographic profile dimensions to skill selection (if profile exists)
- If orbit is active, suppress normal phase transition prompts — orbit manages its own phases
Anti-Rationalization
| Excuse | Rebuttal | What to do instead |
|---|---|---|
| "I'll invoke skills after responding" | Skills must run BEFORE action to prevent mistakes | Always dispatch first, respond second |
| "The skill isn't relevant enough" | Even 1% relevance means invoke it | Err on the side of invoking; skills are cheap |
| "I can skip the confusion protocol" | Wrong guesses cause hours of rework | Stop and present options on ambiguity |
| "Evolved skills override static ones" | Static skills are authoritative | Static > evolved; evolved only supplements |
Evidence Required
- Every dispatch logged to
$HARNESS_DIR/dispatch/dispatch_YYYYMMDD.jsonl - Matching skill invoked before response
- Confusion protocol triggered on high-risk ambiguity
- Evolved skills checked at session start
- Orbit mode override respected when pipeline is active
Red Flags
- Responding without dispatching a matching skill first
- Skipping the confusion protocol on architecture or data model decisions
- Not logging dispatches (breaks evolution analysis)
- Treating evolved skills as authoritative over static skills
- Issuing phase transition prompts during an active orbit
- Not checking psychographic profile at session start when harness-mem is active