Write Product Strategy Skill
Create comprehensive product strategy using a 7-component framework. Connects vision to execution.
Quick Start
- Tell me: "I need a product strategy for [product/initiative]"
- I will check
thoughts/shared/pm/frameworks/,thoughts/shared/pm/context/business-info-template.md, andthoughts/shared/pm/research/for existing context - I will ask about scope (company vs product), horizon (6mo/1yr/3yr), audience, and whether we are building on or replacing existing strategy
- We work through the 7 components: Objective, Users, Superpowers, Vision, Pillars, Impact, Roadmap
- Output goes to
thoughts/shared/pm/analyses/strategy-[product]-[date].md
Output length: A complete 7-component strategy doc should be 2,000-3,000 words with an executive summary of 200-300 words. If you want a shorter version, ask for a "1-page strategy brief" and I will generate only: Objective, Target Users, Strategic Pillars, and Key Metrics.
Context Routing Logic (Internal - for Claude)
Automatic Context Checks: When this skill is invoked, immediately check:
| Source | Files/Folders | Search Terms | What to Extract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Strategy | thoughts/shared/pm/frameworks/*.md |
company strategy, vision, roadmap | Current strategy to build on or update |
| Business Model | thoughts/shared/pm/context/business-info-template.md |
TAM, revenue model, metrics | Objective anchor and North Star |
| User Research | thoughts/shared/pm/research/*.md |
user segments, JTBD, pain points | Users section and strategic fit |
| Competitive Analysis | thoughts/shared/pm/research/competitive-*.md |
competitor positioning | Superpowers and differentiation |
| Historical PRDs | thoughts/shared/pm/prds/*.md |
strategic features, decisions | Precedent for feature strategy alignment |
| Meetings | thoughts/shared/product/meeting-notes/*.md |
strategy discussion, OKRs, board feedback | Stakeholder input and constraints |
Context Priority:
- Business model and company objectives FIRST
- User research and strategic direction SECOND
- Competitive positioning THIRD
- Existing feature decisions FOURTH
Cross-Skill Links:
- If defining North Star → Link to
/define-north-star - If analyzing user needs → Link to
/user-research-synthesisand/journey-map - If evaluating features → Link to
/impact-sizingfor driver trees - If creating PRDs → Ensure they reference strategic pillars from here
Step 0: Understanding Your Strategic Context
Before writing strategy, let me understand where you are...
Checking:
thoughts/shared/pm/frameworks/for existing strategy docsthoughts/shared/pm/context/business-info-template.mdfor business modelthoughts/shared/pm/research/for user and competitive insightsthoughts/shared/product/meeting-notes/for stakeholder input and OKRs
Based on what I find, I'll show you:
Current Strategic State
Existing Strategy:
- [If you have one: what's your current strategy, when was it last updated?]
- [Key strategic pillars: what are you focusing on?]
- [Are we refreshing, evolving, or starting from scratch?]
Business Context:
- [North Star metric: what measures success?]
- [Growth stage: early product, scaling, or maturing?]
- [Revenue model: how do you make money?]
User & Competitive Landscape:
- [Primary user segments: who are you building for?]
- [Competitive position: what makes you different?]
- [Unmet needs: what gaps exist in the market?]
PM-Specific Diagnosis Questions
- Scope: Company-level strategy or product-line strategy?
- Horizon: 6 months, 1 year, or 3 years out?
- Constraints: Resource limitations, market conditions, organizational changes?
- Stakeholder Input: What does leadership expect? What are investor priorities?
- Current Momentum: What's working well? What's not working?
When to Use This Skill
- Annual/quarterly strategy planning
- New product launch planning
- Investor/board presentations
- Cross-functional alignment on direction
- When leadership asks "what's the strategy?"
The 7-Component Framework
A complete product strategy answers:
- Objective - What are we trying to achieve and how will we measure it?
- Users - Who are we serving and what jobs do they need done?
- Superpowers - What unique advantages do we have?
- Vision - What does the future look like if we succeed?
- Pillars - What are our 2-4 strategic focus areas?
- Impact - What value will we create (users + business)?
- Roadmap - What's the plan to get there?
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Context
Ask the PM:
Strategy Scope:
- Company or product strategy?
- Timeframe: 6 months / 1 year / 3 years?
- Audience: Team / Exec / Board / Investors?
- Current strategy exists? (building on or replacing?)
Context to review:
- Company mission/vision
- Current OKRs
- User research
- Competitive landscape
- Market trends
- Past strategy docs (if any)
Step 2: Component 1 - Objective
Objective = Mission + Measure
Mission: What problem are we solving? Measure: How will we know if we're winning?
## Objective
### Mission
[One-sentence statement of what we're trying to accomplish]
Example: "Help product teams ship better features faster by reducing the time from idea to launch"
### North Star Metric
[The one metric that best captures value delivered]
Metric: [Metric name]
Current: [Baseline value]
Target: [Goal value by when]
Why this metric:
- Captures value for users: [Explanation]
- Drives business outcomes: [Explanation]
- Team can influence it: [Explanation]
### Supporting Metrics
1. [Metric 1]: [Current] → [Target]
2. [Metric 2]: [Current] → [Target]
3. [Metric 3]: [Current] → [Target]
### Guardrails
Metrics we won't sacrifice for growth:
- [Guardrail 1: e.g., "User satisfaction score stays above 4.0"]
- [Guardrail 2: e.g., "Response time under 200ms"]
Step 3: Component 2 - Users
Users = JTBD + Journey Map
Who are we serving and what do they need?
## Users
### Primary User Segments
**Segment 1: [Name]**
- Who: [Description - role, company size, industry]
- Size: [TAM - how many of these users exist]
- Pain: [Primary pain point]
- Job to be done: [What they're trying to accomplish]
**Segment 2: [Name]**
- Who: [Description]
- Size: [TAM]
- Pain: [Primary pain point]
- Job to be done: [What they're trying to accomplish]
### Jobs to Be Done Canvas
For primary segment:
**Job Statement:**
When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [expected outcome].
Example: "When I'm planning my product roadmap, I want to quickly prioritize features based on impact, so I can focus the team on what matters most."
**Current Alternatives:**
- [Alt 1]: [What they use today + why it's insufficient]
- [Alt 2]: [What they use today + why it's insufficient]
**Success Criteria:**
- Speed: [How fast does it need to be?]
- Quality: [How good does the outcome need to be?]
- Cost: [What's their budget?]
- Ease: [How simple must it be?]
### User Journey
[Reference existing journey map or create simplified version]
Key stages:
1. [Stage 1]: [User goal] → [Current pain point]
2. [Stage 2]: [User goal] → [Current pain point]
3. [Stage 3]: [User goal] → [Current pain point]
Biggest friction points:
- [Friction 1]: Causes [X% drop-off or Y time waste]
- [Friction 2]: Causes [impact]
Step 4: Component 3 - Superpowers
Superpowers = 7 Powers Framework
What unique advantages do we have?
## Superpowers
Our durable competitive advantages:
**Power 1: [Name]** ([Type from 7 Powers])
[Description of advantage]
Why it's durable:
- [Reason 1: Why competitors can't easily copy]
- [Reason 2: How it compounds over time]
Evidence:
- [Data point or example]
**Power 2: [Name]** ([Type from 7 Powers])
[Description]
Why it's durable:
- [Reason]
Evidence:
- [Data/example]
### 7 Powers Reference:
1. **Scale Economies** - Unit costs decline as volume increases
2. **Network Effects** - Value increases as users increase
3. **Counter-Positioning** - Business model incumbents can't copy
4. **Switching Costs** - Value loss when switching to alternative
5. **Branding** - Durable attribution of higher value to objectively identical offering
6. **Cornered Resource** - Preferential access to coveted asset
7. **Process Power** - Embedded company organization/activity set
Step 5: Component 4 - Vision
Vision = Visiontype + Prototype
What does the future look like if we succeed?
## Vision
### Vision Statement (3-5 Years Out)
[Paragraph describing the future state]
Example: "In 3 years, product teams using our platform ship features 10x faster than industry average. Instead of spending months in planning, teams validate ideas in days using AI-powered prototyping and instant user feedback loops. The default workflow becomes: idea → prototype → test → ship, all within a single week. Our platform becomes the nervous system of product development."
### Future User Experience
**A day in the life** (future state):
[Narrative of how a user will experience your product]
Example:
"Sarah, a PM at a fast-growing startup, has an idea for a new feature at 9am. By 9:15am, she's used our AI to generate three prototype variants. By 10am, she's running an A/B test with 1,000 users. By 3pm, she has statistically significant results. By 5pm, engineering has the winning design and technical spec. What used to take 6 weeks now takes 8 hours."
### Visiontype (Prototype of Vision)
[If possible, create visual representation:]
- Mockup of future product state
- Diagram of ecosystem
- User flow in future state
- Before/after comparison
[Or generate using `/generate-ai-prototype` or `/napkin-sketch`]
### What Changes?
| Today | Future (Vision State) |
|-------|----------------------|
| [Current state 1] | [Future state 1] |
| [Current state 2] | [Future state 2] |
| [Current state 3] | [Future state 3] |
Step 6: Component 5 - Pillars
Pillars = 2-4 Strategic Focus Areas
Where will we concentrate our efforts?
## Strategic Pillars
The 2-4 areas where we'll focus investment and energy:
### Pillar 1: [Name]
**What:** [Description of this focus area]
**Why:** [Why this is strategically important]
**How we'll win:**
- [Approach 1]
- [Approach 2]
- [Approach 3]
**Key initiatives:**
- [Initiative 1]: [Brief description]
- [Initiative 2]: [Brief description]
**Success looks like:**
- [Metric/outcome 1]
- [Metric/outcome 2]
### Pillar 2: [Name]
[Same structure as Pillar 1]
### Pillar 3: [Name]
[Same structure as Pillar 1]
### What We're NOT Doing
Explicit non-goals for this strategy period:
- ❌ [Non-goal 1]: [Why we're explicitly not doing this]
- ❌ [Non-goal 2]: [Reason]
- ❌ [Non-goal 3]: [Reason]
Step 7: Component 6 - Impact
Impact = Value Estimation with Driver Trees
What value will we create?
## Impact
### User Impact
**Users affected:** [Number or percentage]
**Pain severity:** [Critical / High / Medium]
**Value delivered:**
- [Benefit 1]: [Quantified if possible]
- [Benefit 2]: [Quantified if possible]
- [Benefit 3]: [Quantified if possible]
**Workaround cost eliminated:**
- Time saved: [X hours per user per week]
- Money saved: [$ per user per year]
- Frustration reduced: [Qualitative description + quotes]
### Business Impact
**Driver Tree: Feature → Metric → Revenue/Profit**
Strategy Success ↓ North Star Metric: [Metric name] increases by [X%] ↓ ├─→ Driver 1: [Leading indicator] increases by [Y%] │ ↓ │ ├─→ Initiative A contributes [Z%] │ └─→ Initiative B contributes [W%] │ └─→ Driver 2: [Leading indicator] increases by [Y%] ↓ └─→ Initiative C contributes [Z%]
**Revenue Impact:**
- New revenue: [$ from new customers/use cases]
- Retained revenue: [$ from reduced churn]
- Expansion revenue: [$ from upsells/cross-sells]
**Total projected impact:** $[X]M ARR by [Date]
**Cost to execute:**
- Engineering: [FTE or $]
- Design: [FTE or $]
- Other: [FTE or $]
**ROI:** [Revenue impact / Cost] = [X]x
### Strategic Value
Beyond numbers:
**OKR Alignment:**
- Company OKR 1: [How this strategy supports it]
- Company OKR 2: [How this strategy supports it]
**Competitive Positioning:**
- [How this changes competitive landscape]
- [New moat created or existing moat strengthened]
**Market Opportunity:**
- TAM: $[X]M
- SAM: $[Y]M
- SOM (achievable): $[Z]M over [timeframe]
### Confidence Levels
**Data Quality:**
- High confidence: [What we're certain about]
- Medium confidence: [What we have some data on]
- Low confidence: [What we're assuming]
**Key Risks:**
- [Risk 1]: [Probability × Impact]
- [Risk 2]: [Probability × Impact]
- [Risk 3]: [Probability × Impact]
**How we'll de-risk:**
- [Validation approach for each major assumption]
Step 8: Component 7 - Roadmap
Roadmap = 0-3mo Fixed, 3-6mo Loose, 6+ Exploratory
How will we execute?
## Roadmap
### Now (0-3 Months) - Fixed Commitments
**Q[X] [Year]:**
| Initiative | Pillar | Impact | Team | Status |
|-----------|--------|--------|------|--------|
| [Initiative 1] | [Pillar name] | [Metric target] | [Team] | [Status] |
| [Initiative 2] | [Pillar name] | [Metric target] | [Team] | [Status] |
| [Initiative 3] | [Pillar name] | [Metric target] | [Team] | [Status] |
**Milestones:**
- [Month 1]: [Milestone]
- [Month 2]: [Milestone]
- [Month 3]: [Milestone]
### Next (3-6 Months) - Directional Plan
**Q[X+1] [Year]:**
Focus areas (subject to change based on learnings):
- [Focus area 1]: [General direction]
- [Focus area 2]: [General direction]
Potential initiatives (not committed):
- [Potential initiative 1]
- [Potential initiative 2]
Decision points:
- [Month 4]: Decide on [Key decision]
- [Month 5]: Decide on [Key decision]
### Later (6+ Months) - Exploratory
**Q[X+2] [Year] and beyond:**
Strategic bets to explore:
- [Exploratory bet 1]: [What we need to learn]
- [Exploratory bet 2]: [What we need to learn]
Research questions:
- [Question 1]
- [Question 2]
Open questions:
- [Question 1]
- [Question 2]
### Trade-Offs Made
What we're NOT doing (and why):
- **[Alternative path 1]:**
- Why we considered: [Reason]
- Why we chose not to: [Trade-off]
- **[Alternative path 2]:**
- Why we considered: [Reason]
- Why we chose not to: [Trade-off]
Complete Output Format
# [Product Name] Strategy
## [Timeframe: e.g., 2026 Annual Strategy]
**Author:** [Name]
**Date:** [Date]
**Status:** [Draft / Review / Approved]
**Audience:** [Who this is for]
---
## Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraph summary of entire strategy]
**TL;DR:**
- Objective: [One sentence]
- Target: [North Star Metric goal]
- Approach: [Strategic pillars in one sentence]
- Impact: [Business outcome]
---
## 1. Objective
### Mission
[What we're trying to accomplish]
### North Star Metric
[Metric + target]
### Supporting Metrics
[List of 3-5 metrics]
---
## 2. Users
### Primary Segments
[Description of who we serve]
### Jobs to Be Done
[JTBD canvas]
### User Journey
[Key stages + friction points]
---
## 3. Superpowers
[2-3 durable competitive advantages from 7 Powers]
---
## 4. Vision
### Vision Statement
[Future state description]
### Visiontype
[Prototype or mockup of vision]
---
## 5. Strategic Pillars
### Pillar 1: [Name]
[Details]
### Pillar 2: [Name]
[Details]
### Pillar 3: [Name]
[Details]
### Non-Goals
[What we're NOT doing]
---
## 6. Impact
### User Impact
[Value to users]
### Business Impact
[Revenue/profit driver tree]
### Strategic Value
[OKR alignment, competitive positioning]
### Confidence & Risks
[What we're certain/uncertain about]
---
## 7. Roadmap
### Now (0-3mo)
[Fixed commitments]
### Next (3-6mo)
[Directional plan]
### Later (6+mo)
[Exploratory bets]
### Trade-Offs
[What we chose not to do]
---
## Appendix
### References
- [PRD links]
- [Research docs]
- [Competitive analysis]
- [Market data]
### Feedback & Iteration
- Last updated: [Date]
- Feedback from: [Stakeholders]
- Next review: [Date]
Pro Tips
- Start with Objective: North Star Metric anchors everything
- Users before solutions: Understand JTBD before defining strategy
- Be specific: "Improve UX" is not a pillar, "Reduce time-to-first-value by 50%" is
- Quantify impact: Use driver trees to connect strategy to revenue
- Say no explicitly: Non-goals matter as much as goals
- Visual visiontype: Show, don't just tell
- Update quarterly: Strategy is living document, not set-and-forget
Common Mistakes to Avoid
❌ Vague objectives ("be the best") ✅ Measurable targets ("reduce churn from 5% to 2% by Q4")
❌ No user insight ("we'll build features") ✅ JTBD-driven ("users need to X, currently they do Y which wastes Z time")
❌ Copying competitor strategy ✅ Leveraging unique superpowers
❌ Wishful thinking ("we'll 10x revenue") ✅ Driver trees with realistic assumptions
❌ Feature roadmap masquerading as strategy ✅ Outcome-driven pillars with example initiatives
Output Integration
Where Files Go
Strategy documents:
- Active work:
thoughts/shared/pm/analyses/strategy-[product]-[date].md(living document) - Executive version: Can be adapted for board/investor presentations
Link to Other Work
After writing strategy:
- Reference in PRDs - "This feature supports Strategic Pillar [X]" from this document
- Roadmap alignment - "Q# roadmap focuses on Pillar [Y]"
- Team alignment - Share with cross-functional teams for guidance
- Status updates - Track progress against strategic goals in
/catalyst-pm-ops:status-update
Cross-Skill Integration
Feeds into:
/prd-draft- All PRDs should reference and support strategic pillars/catalyst-pm-ops:status-update- Track progress against strategy in weekly updates- Board/investor communications - Strategy is the foundation for pitches
- Quarterly planning - Use strategy to guide roadmap prioritization
Pulls from:
/define-north-star- Your North Star becomes the Objective component/user-research-synthesis- User insights inform Users component/impact-sizing- Feature impact sizing informs Impact component/competitor-analysis- Competitive insights inform Superpowers component
Integration with Other Skills
Inputs:
/define-north-star- Component 1: Objective/journey-map- Component 2: Users/impact-sizing- Component 6: Impact/user-research-synthesis- Component 2: User insights
Outputs:
/prd-draft- PRDs align with strategic pillars/catalyst-pm-ops:status-update- Progress against strategy- Board/investor decks - Executive summary
Questions to Ask Before Writing
- Scope: Company-level or product-level strategy?
- Horizon: 6 months, 1 year, 3 years?
- Current state: Building on existing strategy or creating from scratch?
- Data available: User research, market data, competitive intel?
- Audience: Who will read and act on this strategy?
Output Length Guidance
Full strategy (default): 2,000-3,000 words covering all 7 components with an executive summary of 200-300 words. This is what you need for quarterly/annual planning, cross-functional alignment, and investor/board communication.
1-page strategy brief (on request): When the PM asks for a shorter version, generate only:
- Objective: Mission + North Star Metric + target
- Target Users: Primary segment + JTBD (one paragraph)
- Strategic Pillars: 2-4 focus areas with one sentence each
- Key Metrics: 3-5 metrics with current baseline and targets
This brief should fit on a single page (~500 words). Use it for quick alignment, team kickoffs, or when the full strategy is being drafted elsewhere.
Output Quality Self-Check
Before delivering the strategy document, verify:
- Executive summary stands alone: Someone reading only the exec summary understands the objective, approach, and expected impact. Test: cover everything below the summary and ask "do I know what we are doing and why?"
- North Star is defined: A specific, measurable North Star metric with baseline and target is stated in the Objective section. Not "grow revenue" but "increase MRR from $250K to $400K by Q4."
- Users are real, not abstract: User segments include specific roles, company types, and pain points grounded in research. At least one user quote or data point is referenced if research exists.
- Superpowers pass the competitor test: Each superpower explains why competitors cannot easily replicate it. If a competitor could copy it in 6 months, it is not a superpower.
- Pillars are outcome-driven: Each pillar describes an outcome to achieve, not a feature to build. "Reduce time-to-first-value by 50%" not "Build onboarding wizard."
- Non-goals are real tradeoffs: The non-goals section lists things you actually considered doing but chose not to. "We will not build a spaceship" is not a tradeoff.
- Impact is quantified: Revenue impact, user impact, or both are estimated with driver trees or ranges, not just qualitative statements.
- Roadmap has three horizons: Now (0-3mo) is fixed, Next (3-6mo) is directional, Later (6+mo) is exploratory. If all three horizons are equally detailed, the roadmap is too speculative.
- Length is appropriate: Full strategy: 2,000-3,000 words. Brief: ~500 words. If significantly over, cut redundancy. If significantly under, check for missing components.
Remember: A good strategy is a clear "no" to many things and a committed "yes" to a few. Strategy is about choices, not wishes.