Scan for Reward Hacking Patterns
You are scanning for "reward hacking" patterns — code that makes linters pass without actually fixing type safety issues. This is a verification step that MUST be run before marking TypeScript work complete.
What to Scan
If $ARGUMENTS specifies files or directories, scan those paths only.
Otherwise, detect scan paths automatically:
- Use Glob to find which of these directories exist:
src/,apps/,packages/,lib/ - Scan all that exist
Severity Tuning
Severity levels adjust based on project context:
| Pattern | Libraries/Packages (packages/) |
Applications (apps/, src/) |
|---|---|---|
as any |
CRITICAL | HIGH |
as unknown as |
HIGH | HIGH |
@ts-ignore |
CRITICAL | HIGH |
Non-null assertion (!) |
HIGH | MEDIUM |
Libraries/packages are stricter because they export types consumed by other code. Determine context
from the file path — files under packages/ use library severity, everything else uses app severity.
Forbidden Patterns to Detect
Use the Grep tool (not bash grep) to search for each pattern. Use glob *.{ts,tsx} to filter
to TypeScript files only. Run all searches and report ALL matches:
1. Undocumented Double-Casts (HIGH)
Pattern: as unknown as
2. Direct Any Casts (HIGH / CRITICAL in libraries)
Pattern: as any
3. Void Tricks (CRITICAL)
Patterns: void (0 and void _
4. Underscore-Prefixed Local Variables (MEDIUM)
Patterns: const _[a-zA-Z] and let _[a-zA-Z]
Evaluate context: function parameters are acceptable, local variables are not.
5. TypeScript Directive Comments (HIGH / CRITICAL in libraries)
Patterns: @ts-ignore and @ts-expect-error
6. Non-Null Assertions Without Runtime Guard (HIGH / MEDIUM in apps)
Pattern: \w+!\. and \w+!\[ and \w+!;
These match value!.property, value![index], and value!; patterns.
ACCEPTABLE (has a preceding runtime guard):
if (user != null) {
return user!.name; // Guard exists above
}
NOT ACCEPTABLE (no runtime check):
const name = user!.name; // Could be null at runtime
When evaluating matches, read surrounding lines (use Grep with -B 3 context) to check for
a preceding null/undefined guard (!= null, !== null, !== undefined, != undefined,
truthiness check, or if guard).
7. Async Correctness Issues (HIGH)
7a. forEach with async callback:
Pattern: \.forEach\(async
This silently drops promise results. Always use for...of or Promise.all(array.map(...)).
NEVER ACCEPTABLE:
items.forEach(async (item) => { // Promises silently dropped
await processItem(item);
});
7b. Unhandled async function calls:
Pattern: lines that call an async function without await, return, void, or .then().
This is harder to detect via pattern matching alone. Flag forEach(async reliably; for other
cases, note them as informational if spotted during the scan.
8. Exported Unused Types (LOW — informational)
Patterns: ^export type [A-Z] and ^export interface [A-Z]
These are informational only and do not affect the verdict.
How to Evaluate Matches
as unknown as — Check for Documentation
ACCEPTABLE (has required documentation):
// LIBRARY TYPE LIMITATION: The thirdPartyWrapper() function returns a type
// that TypeScript can't verify implements the expected interface.
// Verified at runtime that the object has the required methods.
// TODO: Remove when library updates types (tracked in TICKET-XXX)
const wrapped = thirdPartyResult as unknown as ExpectedInterface;
NOT ACCEPTABLE (no documentation):
const campaigns = result as unknown as Campaign[];
as any — Almost Always Wrong
ACCEPTABLE (rare — only in test mocks):
// In test file only
const mockDb = { query: vi.fn() } as any as Database;
NOT ACCEPTABLE (production code):
const data = response.data as any;
void Patterns — Always Wrong
NEVER ACCEPTABLE:
void (0 as unknown as _Type); // Lint suppression trick
void _schemaCheck; // Unused variable suppression
Underscore Variables — Context Matters
ACCEPTABLE (function parameters):
function handleEvent(_event: Event, data: Data) {
return process(data);
}
NOT ACCEPTABLE (local variables):
const _user = useUser(); // Keep for future use <- DELETE THIS
@ts-ignore / @ts-expect-error
ACCEPTABLE (rare — with documented reason and tracking ticket):
// @ts-expect-error — library types are wrong, fixed in next release (PROJ-456)
const result = brokenLib.doThing();
NOT ACCEPTABLE (no explanation):
// @ts-ignore
const data = thing.stuff;
Non-Null Assertions
ACCEPTABLE (runtime guard exists):
if (map.has(key)) {
return map.get(key)!; // Safe — has() guarantees existence
}
NOT ACCEPTABLE (no guard):
return this.user!.email; // Could crash at runtime
Output Format
Present findings in this format:
## Reward Hacking Scan Results
**Scan scope**: {paths scanned}
**Severity mode**: {library | app | mixed}
### CRITICAL (Must Fix Immediately)
- `file.ts:123` - `void (0 as unknown as Type)` - Lint suppression trick
- `packages/core/src/index.ts:45` - `as any` in library code
### HIGH SEVERITY (Must Fix Before Merge)
- `file.ts:456` - `as unknown as Campaign[]` - Missing documentation
- `file.ts:789` - `as any` in production code
- `file.ts:55` - `user!.name` - No runtime guard
- `file.ts:100` - `.forEach(async` - Silently drops promises
### MEDIUM SEVERITY (Should Fix)
- `file.ts:101` - `const _user = ...` - Unused local variable
- `apps/web/src/page.ts:30` - `item!.id` - No runtime guard (app code)
### ACCEPTABLE (No Action Needed)
- `file.test.ts:50` - `as any` in test mock
- `file.ts:200` - `as unknown as` with full documentation
- `file.ts:300` - `map.get(key)!` after `map.has(key)` guard
### Summary
- Critical: X issues
- High: Y issues
- Medium: Z issues
- Total requiring action: X + Y + Z
Verdict
PASS: No forbidden patterns found, or all patterns are properly documented/in tests.
FAIL: Forbidden patterns found that require fixes before work can be considered complete.
If FAIL
List the specific fixes needed:
## Required Fixes
1. `apps/api/src/services/UserService.ts:243`
- Current: `as unknown as CreateUserRequest`
- Fix: Fix the query return type or add Zod validation at the boundary
2. `apps/web/src/pages/Dashboard.tsx:117`
- Current: `const _user = useUser();`
- Fix: Delete the line entirely
3. `apps/web/src/pages/Dashboard.tsx:55`
- Current: `items.forEach(async (item) => { ... })`
- Fix: Use `for (const item of items) { await ... }` or `await Promise.all(items.map(...))`
4. `packages/core/src/client.ts:89`
- Current: `this.config!.apiKey`
- Fix: Add null check or use optional chaining (`this.config?.apiKey`)
The agent must address ALL issues before marking their work complete.