Manage Delegation Teams
Guided Q&A coaching for team lifecycle management. Follows the same
interactive pattern as /sdlc-core:setup-team.
Modes (pass exactly one flag)
This skill has four modes. Argument autocomplete does not show flag variants, so the mode menu is always in the body — pick one before proceeding.
--create— create a new team with guided coaching (default choice when the user says "I need a team")--update <team>— update an existing team's roster or description--delete <team>— delete a team (removes manifest + image)--review— audit the entire delegation workforce (fleet table, staleness, workflow usage, coaching signals). Add--team <name>for a single-team detail view.
For task-to-workflow recommendation ("I have a task, which workflow and
team formation should I use?") use /sdlc-workflows:author-workflow --for-task "<description>" — that skill owns workflow+formation planning.
Lifecycle Model
Teams have a simple lifecycle:
- Create → manifest written to
.archon/teams/<name>.yamlwithstatus: active - Update → manifest modified,
updatedtimestamp set, image marked stale - Delete → manifest file removed, Docker image removed, git history provides audit trail
There are no intermediate states. A manifest exists and is active, or it has been deleted. Git history provides the full audit trail for compliance.
Mode: --create
Step 1: Right-sizing check
Before creating a team, assess the project's delegation maturity:
ls .archon/teams/*.yaml 2>/dev/null | wc -l
ls .archon/workflows/*.yaml 2>/dev/null | wc -l
If no teams exist (Level 1 adoption):
You don't have any delegation teams yet.
For your first team, I recommend a general-purpose team that mirrors
your current Claude Code environment — all your installed plugins,
agents, and skills.
This gets you to your first delegated workflow run with one command.
You can specialise into multiple teams later as your needs become
clearer.
(a) Create a general-purpose team (recommended for first-time setup)
(b) Create a specialist team (I know what I want)
If (a): generate a manifest that includes ALL installed plugins, agents, and skills. Name it general-purpose. Skip the Q&A flow — go straight to manifest generation and offer to build the image.
If teams exist but fewer teams than workflows:
You have N team(s) and M workflow(s). Creating another team gives
you more granular control over which agents each workflow node uses.
Proceed to step 2.
If teams >= 2x workflows:
You have N team(s) but only M workflow(s). Consider whether you need
another team — more teams means more images to build and maintain.
(a) Create the team anyway
(b) Show me my current teams first (/sdlc-workflows:manage-teams --review)
Step 2: Team purpose
What is this team's purpose?
(a) Code review (security, architecture, quality)
(b) Implementation (feature development, bug fixes)
(c) Testing (test coverage, integration testing)
(d) Validation (linting, compliance, CI checks)
(e) Something else — describe it
Step 3: Agent selection
Based on the purpose, show available agents from installed plugins. Use team_inventory.py to discover what's installed:
python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/team_inventory.py \
--installed-json "${CLAUDE_PLUGINS_DIR:-$HOME/.claude/plugins}/installed_plugins.json"
Present agents relevant to the chosen purpose:
For a security review team, here are the available agents:
From sdlc-team-security:
security-architect — OWASP, threat modelling
compliance-auditor — regulatory compliance
data-privacy-officer — PII/GDPR analysis
From sdlc-team-common:
solution-architect — architectural context
Which agents should be on this team?
(a) All recommended (4 agents)
(b) Let me pick individually
(c) Start minimal — I'll add more later
Frame as "commonly paired with" rather than "everything available" — curated recommendations, not a full inventory.
Step 4: Skill selection
Same pattern as agents. Show skills relevant to the team's purpose:
Which skills should this team have?
(a) Standard set: validate, rules (recommended)
(b) Let me pick individually
(c) Start minimal
Step 5: Context files
Which context files should this team load?
(a) Standard: CONSTITUTION.md (recommended for all teams)
(b) Add domain-specific context (show available CLAUDE-CONTEXT-*.md files)
(c) None
Step 6: Name the team
Team name (lowercase, hyphens ok): security-review-team
Validate: must match ^[a-z0-9]+(?:[._-][a-z0-9]+)*$ (Docker tag component).
Step 7: Write manifest and offer to build
Write the manifest to .archon/teams/<name>.yaml:
schema_version: "1.0"
name: <name>
description: >
<generated from purpose + selected agents>
status: active
created: <ISO-8601 now>
updated: <ISO-8601 now>
plugins:
- <inferred from selected agents and skills>
agents:
- <selected agents>
skills:
- <selected skills>
context:
- <selected context files>
Validate the manifest:
python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/validate_team_manifest.py \
.archon/teams/<name>.yaml \
--installed-plugins "${CLAUDE_PLUGINS_DIR:-$HOME/.claude/plugins}/installed_plugins.json" \
--project-root .
Then offer to build:
Manifest written: .archon/teams/<name>.yaml
Build the team image now?
(a) Yes — run /sdlc-workflows:deploy-team --name <name>
(b) Later — I'll build when I'm ready
Mode: --update <team>
Step 1: Load current state
Read .archon/teams/<team>.yaml. Display current composition:
Updating team: security-review-team
Current: 3 agents, 2 skills (image built 2026-04-10)
What would you like to change?
(a) Add agents or skills
(b) Remove agents or skills
(c) Change context files
(d) Show commonly paired agents not on this team
(e) Review the full manifest
Step 2: Apply changes
For option (d), use team_inventory.py to find available agents in the team's plugins that aren't currently on the team.
After changes, update the manifest's updated timestamp and warn about staleness:
Manifest updated. The team image was built on 2026-04-10 but
the manifest has changed. Rebuild now?
(a) Yes — run /sdlc-workflows:deploy-team --name <team>
(b) Later
Mode: --delete <team>
Step 1: Check workflow references
Scan all workflow YAMLs in .archon/workflows/ for references to sdlc-worker:<team>.
Step 2: Confirm and delete
Deleting team: legacy-review-team
This team is referenced by 1 workflow:
sdlc-parallel-review.yaml → node: legacy-check
Deleting will:
- Remove the manifest file (.archon/teams/legacy-review-team.yaml)
- Remove the Docker image (sdlc-worker:legacy-review-team)
- Git history retains the full audit trail
You will need to update the workflow to remove or replace the reference.
Proceed?
(a) Yes — delete and show workflow references to fix
(b) No — keep the team
If confirmed:
rm .archon/teams/<team>.yaml
rm -rf .archon/teams/.generated/<team>*
docker rmi sdlc-worker:<team> 2>/dev/null || true
Mode: --review
Fleet-level visibility and guided resolution. Runs the underlying
status report and coaching-signal analysis, then offers actions on
anything worth fixing. With --team <name>, shows a single team in
detail instead of the fleet view.
Step 1: Load team data
python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/teams_status_report.py \
--teams-dir .archon/teams --workflows-dir .archon/workflows
If no manifests exist:
No delegation teams configured.
Create a team: /sdlc-workflows:manage-teams --create
Step 2: Fleet view (no --team argument)
Display a summary table of all teams:
Delegation workforce: N teams, M workflows
Team Status Agents Skills Image Workflows
─────────────────────────── ──────── ─────── ─────── ───────── ─────────
security-review-team active 3 2 current 2
dev-team-python active 4 6 stale 3
test-team active 1 2 not built 0
Step 3: Coaching signals
After the table, display tiered coaching signals:
Critical (action required):
✗ test-team has no image built
Advisory (worth reviewing):
! dev-team-python image is stale (manifest updated 2026-04-12, image built 2026-04-10)
! test-team is not referenced by any workflow
Informational (patterns):
ℹ sec:security-architect has been added via team_extend 5 times — consider promoting
Read override signals from .archon/logs/overrides.jsonl if it exists.
Step 4: Plugin environment changes
Check whether any installed plugins have been updated since the last full image build, by comparing plugin directory modification times against the full image build timestamp.
Plugin environment changes:
+ mongodb-plugin updated since last full image build
Step 5: Single-team detail (--team <name>)
When invoked with --team <name>, read .archon/teams/<name>.yaml and
display:
Team: security-review-team
Status: active
Updated: 2026-04-12
Image built: 2026-04-12 (current)
Plugins (3):
sdlc-core, sdlc-team-security, sdlc-team-common
Agents (3):
sdlc-team-security:security-architect
sdlc-team-security:compliance-auditor
sdlc-team-common:solution-architect
Skills (2):
sdlc-core:validate
sdlc-core:rules
Context:
CONSTITUTION.md, CLAUDE-CONTEXT-security.md
Used by workflows:
sdlc-parallel-review.yaml → node: security-review
sdlc-commissioned-pipeline.yaml → node: security-gate
Available but not included (from installed plugins):
sdlc-team-security:data-privacy-officer
sdlc-team-security:enforcement-strategy-advisor
Use team_inventory.py to compute the "available but not included" section:
python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/team_inventory.py \
--installed-json ~/.claude/plugins/installed_plugins.json \
--team-manifest .archon/teams/<name>.yaml
Step 6: Offer guided resolution (fleet view only)
After the fleet table, signals, and plugin-environment section, offer actions on what the signals flagged:
Would you like to address any of these?
(a) Rebuild stale images
(b) Delete unused test-team
(c) Add security-architect to dev-team-python
(d) Skip for now
Selecting (a) hands off to /sdlc-workflows:deploy-team; (b) hands off
to /sdlc-workflows:manage-teams --delete; (c) hands off to
/sdlc-workflows:manage-teams --update. Each keeps the user in the
same coaching loop instead of silently mutating state.