STOP — DO NOT READ THIS FILE. You are already reading it. This prompt was injected into your context by Claude Code's plugin system. Using the Read tool on this SKILL.md file wastes ~7,600 tokens. Begin executing Step 1 immediately.
/pbr:test — Post-Phase Test Generation
You are the orchestrator for /pbr:test. This skill generates tests for code that was built WITHOUT TDD mode. It targets key files from completed phases and creates meaningful test coverage.
Context Budget
Reference: skills/shared/context-budget.md for the universal orchestrator rules.
Reference: skills/shared/agent-type-resolution.md for agent type fallback when spawning Task() subagents.
Additionally for this skill:
- Delegate all test writing to executor subagents — never write test code in the main context
- Read only SUMMARY.md frontmatter for
key_fileslists — do not read full summaries
Step 0 — Immediate Output
Before ANY tool calls, display this banner:
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ PLAN-BUILD-RUN ► GENERATING TESTS FOR PHASE {N} ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Where {N} is the phase number from $ARGUMENTS.
CRITICAL — DO NOT SKIP: Set active skill. Write .planning/.active-skill with content test.
Then proceed to Step 1.
Prerequisites
.planning/config.jsonexists- Phase has been built: SUMMARY.md files exist in
.planning/phases/{NN}-{slug}/ - If no SUMMARY.md files exist in the phase directory, display error and exit. Do not proceed without build output.
- Phase should NOT already have TDD coverage (check if
features.tdd_modeis false in config — if TDD mode is enabled, warn user that tests should already exist and ask to proceed anyway)
Argument Parsing
Parse $ARGUMENTS according to skills/shared/phase-argument-parsing.md.
| Argument | Meaning |
|---|---|
3 |
Generate tests for phase 3 |
| (no number) | Use current phase from STATE.md |
Step 1 — Gather Context
CRITICAL: Run init command to load project state efficiently.
pbr-tools" init execute-phase {phase_number}
This returns STATE.md snapshot, phase plans, ROADMAP excerpt, and config — all in one call.
The init command returns files_to_read context. Ensure SUMMARY.md files are read before spawning test agents.
Step 2 — Detect Test Framework
Scan the project root for test framework indicators:
- Check
package.jsonforjest,vitest,mocha,avain devDependencies - Check for
pytest.ini,pyproject.toml(with[tool.pytest]),setup.cfg(with[tool:pytest]) - Check for
jest.config.*,vitest.config.*,.mocharc.* - Check for existing test directories:
tests/,test/,__tests__/,spec/ - Check for existing test file patterns:
*.test.*,*.spec.*,test_*.py
If no test framework is detected, ask the user:
Use AskUserQuestion: question: "No test framework detected. Which should I use?" header: "Framework" options: - label: "Jest" description: "JavaScript/TypeScript testing (most common)" - label: "Vitest" description: "Vite-native testing (faster, ESM-friendly)" - label: "pytest" description: "Python testing framework" multiSelect: false
Step 3 — Collect Target Files
Read SUMMARY.md frontmatter from each plan in the phase to extract key_files:
pbr-tools" frontmatter .planning/phases/{NN}-{slug}/SUMMARY.md
Collect all key_files across all plans in the phase. Filter to only source files (exclude config, docs, assets). Group by:
- High priority: Files with business logic, API endpoints, data models
- Medium priority: Utility functions, helpers, middleware
- Low priority: Config, types-only files, constants
Present the file list to the user:
Use AskUserQuestion: question: "Found {N} source files from phase {P}. Generate tests for which?" header: "Scope" options: - label: "High priority only" description: "{X} files — business logic, APIs, models" - label: "High + Medium" description: "{Y} files — adds utilities and helpers" - label: "All files" description: "{Z} files — comprehensive coverage" multiSelect: false
Step 4 — Generate Test Plans
For each target file, create a lightweight test plan (NOT a full PBR PLAN.md — just a task list):
File: src/auth/login.js
Tests to generate:
- Happy path: valid credentials return token
- Error: invalid password returns 401
- Error: missing email returns 400
- Edge: expired session handling
Framework: jest
Output: tests/auth/login.test.js
Step 5 — Spawn Executor Agents
CRITICAL: Delegate ALL test writing to subagents. Do NOT write test code in the main context.
For each target file (or batch of related files), spawn an executor agent:
Spawn subagent_type: "pbr:executor"
Task: Generate tests for the following file(s):
<files_to_test>
{file_path}: {brief description from SUMMARY}
</files_to_test>
<test_framework>
{detected framework name and version}
Existing test directory: {path}
Test file naming: {pattern, e.g., *.test.js}
</test_framework>
<test_plan>
{test plan from Step 4}
</test_plan>
Instructions:
1. Read each source file to understand the implementation
2. Write test files following the project's existing test patterns
3. Each test file should cover: happy path, error cases, edge cases
4. Use the project's existing mocking patterns if any exist
5. Run the tests to verify they pass: {test command}
6. Commit with format: test({phase}-tests): add tests for {file}
Spawn up to parallelization.max_concurrent_agents agents in parallel for independent files.
Step 6 — Verify and Report
After all agents complete, check results:
- Glob for new test files created in this session
- Run the test suite to verify all new tests pass:
{test_command} - Count: files tested, tests written, tests passing
Display completion:
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ PLAN-BUILD-RUN ► TESTS GENERATED ✓ ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Phase {N}: {X} test files created, {Y} tests passing
Files tested:
- src/auth/login.js → tests/auth/login.test.js (8 tests)
- src/api/users.js → tests/api/users.test.js (12 tests)
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ ▶ NEXT UP ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
**Run quality gate** to check for requirement-to-test gaps
`/pbr:validate-phase {N}`
**Run coverage check** to see how much is covered
`npm test -- --coverage`
<sub>`/clear` first → fresh context window</sub>
**Also available:**
- `/pbr:verify-work {N}` — verify the full phase
- `/pbr:continue` — execute next logical step
Clear active skill: Delete .planning/.active-skill.
Step 7 — Update State
Reference: skills/shared/state-update.md for state update patterns.
Update STATE.md last_activity: "Tests generated for phase {N} ({X} files, {Y} tests)"
Step 8 — Commit
Reference: skills/shared/commit-planning-docs.md for the commit pattern.
If planning.commit_docs is true in config.json, commit test files:
test({N}-tests): add tests for phase {N} ({X} test files)
Anti-Patterns
- DO NOT write test code in the main orchestrator context — always delegate to executor agents
- DO NOT generate tests for files not listed in SUMMARY.md key_files — stay scoped to the phase
- DO NOT skip running the tests — always verify they pass before reporting success
- DO NOT generate trivial tests (testing getters/setters, testing constants) — focus on behavior
- DO NOT read full source files in the orchestrator — let the executor agents read them
Error Handling
Reference: skills/shared/error-reporting.md for error output patterns.
If test framework detection fails or no key_files found, display branded error and clear .planning/.active-skill.